|
The Women Warriors Uniting people, reclaiming the planet Earth
|
By entering this site, you agree to the disclaimers and the confidentiality agreement on our Home Page MEMBERSHIP ON THIS BOARD IS BY INVITATION ONLY.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: UCC "Redemption" Scheme |
|
|
From this forum...
http://ecclesia.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=56
UCC Redemption proponents offer 'cure all claims' and 'silver bullet solutions' to present dilemmas in the struggle for freedom and independence. One of the reasons the world is in such trouble today is because we are to willing to sign on to offers that sound to good to be true. If we will grab at straws in desperation why not grab at strawmen? I believe there are some deadly flaws hidden among the truths of the UCC redemption process.
Before going to Ur, Abraham and his people lived in the Indus Valley. They left because of conflict with the Asuras who were "The mercantile caste". What do they mean Mercantile caste and what was the conflict all about?
When the Bible says Abraham was led throughout all the land of Canaan the term meant something particular. Canaan means merchants or traffickers which is what the Asuras were.
Trafficker of what?
Human sweat and blood. To live by the blood and sweat and toil of your brother rather than your own sweat is a form of social cannibalism. It was a covetous system imposed on men by men.
This is really what UCC is all about, merchants of mankind.
"For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her delicacies." Revelation 18:3
Commerce has to do with the buying and selling of goods having "profit as the chief aim" which means 'gain'. Gain and profit is not a matter of mere exchange but includes the idea of increase, usually at someone else's expense.
In looking for a good definition of commerce the best one I found was from The Devil's Dictionary (C)1911 which says, "COMMERCE, n.. A kind of transaction in which A plunders from B the goods of C, and for compensation B picks the pocket of D of money belonging to E."
It is interesting to note that the US Census is no longer done by the Department of Interior but by the Commerce Department. Birth Certificates are also registered with the Commerce Department, not only in this country but in many others. Many nations did so around 1957. So, is the Census merely an inventory of commodities available for trade or collateral?
Birth Certification by the Federal government through the State and local Counties is nothing more than adoption of a child as a child of the state where by the State becomes the father or Parens Patria.
It is not by consent or apparent consent alone that one may be subjugated as a commodity or mere Human Resource. It is also by participating deeds.
The Social Security systems also plays an important role in sealing the fate of a people (in other countries these systems are called by other names, all bound together by treaty). Social Security is both a Corban which Jesus warned against [see Mark 7:11] and a corvee system of statutory labor [not unlike that slavery in Egypt] where by a portion of your sweat, blood and tears becomes the property of the State in return for the security and protection of that exclusive corporate society.
"UCC Redemption" is supposed to protect you from the surety nature of the Social Security system.
What "UCC Redemption" does is make you solely responsible for any and all debt. It removes you from the collective debt but does not remove the liability. You become your own redeemer, beneficiary and fiduciary. You do not become the owner of your self but the owner of your debt and surety responsibility. Many will become angry at the idea that there may be a real debt. Let us assume for a moment spiritual and physical debt are as linked as body and soul.
Yet, Michael the Archangel, when contending with the devil in dispute about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee [see Jude 1:9].
If you keep your Certificates and surety number [SSN] you will still fall under their power and nothing will stand between you and them. You will stand naked in the World.
Expatriation is the key. Abraham, Moses, Israel and the rest of the people, priests, and Levites often found it necessary to expatriate and separate themselves from the commercial parens patria type systems that have appeared throughout history. This was also true of the early "Christians". Redemption is the answer, but how should that redemption be accomplished?.
Moving from citizenship in the "United States federal democracy" [a legal corporation] into the American Republic in which that corporate government does exist is the first step to expatriation. But, in the law of nations, a true Republic has no standing except as a loose group of naked individuals standing on the land. An individual is not a nation.
In a true republic, the leaders are only "titular". Because of this, the representative leaders do not have real treaty-making powers. If they are granted such powers, the freedom of the individuals of the republic is diminished considerably.
The constitution did not create a Republic. It created the corporate US federal democracy within a Republic which, being organic, has continued to metamorphose itself into the present bestial state of control, exercising authority of elite men over the others. The more you are involved with this corporate entity, the more power it develops to regulate your life. It's ability to make agreements on your behalf is greatly expanded. The federal Government takes on the role of Parens Patria, your protector and father.
"Patronus (Lat.) In Roman Law. A modification of the Latin word Pater, father. A denomination applied by Romulus to the first senators of Rome, and which they afterwards bore."
"A person who stood in the relation of protector to another who was called his 'client.'" Black's 3rd Ed. page 1338.
"Excise (excise taxes or tribute), in its origin, is the patrimonial right of emperors and kings." Vectigal, origina ipsa, jus Caesarum et regum patrimoniale est.
Government and its power is based on indebtedness or the right of the Father over his sons or adopted children. Adoption often begins with certification.
Expatriation in the United States Code is found in TITTLE 8 - ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12
To expatriate alone does not include repatriation to another sovereignty. There has never been any Nation or Kingdom that has presented the perfect law of Liberty better than the Kingdom of Heaven on earth.
[See TITLE 15, Sec. 15h. Applicability of Parens Patriae actions: STATUTE- Sections 15c, 15d, 15e, 15f, and 15g of this title shall apply in any State, unless such State provides by law for its non-applicability in such State.]
Parens Patria action is not applicable in the Kingdom of Heaven on earth because we are commanded so:
And call no [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. (Matthew 23:9)
To make such a statement was a shock to those who thought man's governments and the Roman political and judicial system, its peace and commerce was good for society and business. Since Rome and the US are identical systems, modern Christian "patriots" would find that statement unbearable if they ever understood it.
In the original Greek text we find the Latin word pater, meaning 'father'. Pater was used everyday as a title of address in reference to the Senators of Rome and of course the Emperor (and before him the pro council) was referred to as 'the father of the senate' and therefore 'the Empire'. The Romans developed an elected congress called patres consritpi, the conscripted fathers.
So, we can assume that the people of the day when they heard the word pater, they knew what Jesus was saying.
The Apostate Church and church type organizations do not preach the good news of the kingdom of Heaven on earth nor the perfect law of Liberty. They instead crown men kings over other men, call for submission to those who would rob widows and orphans, who would take your sons to run before their chariots, who would kill the innocent and mine the wombs of your daughters, who devour the weak and covet the wealth of all. They have hidden the Kingdom of Heaven from the people and have turned God's world upside down and Making the word of God of none effect through their traditions
So, where is the Kingdom of God on earth? We always think of Kingdoms as land, but the most essential ingredient is that of men which are made of land anyway. Abraham knew this and so did Moses and Jesus.
Land has always been an essential ingredient to sovereignty, even of a Parens Patria position of the Father. In this case, the land the individual freed men are standing on is generally not their own land, nor do the individual states still have title to their land.
Land ownership, of some amount, somewhere is essential to the Law of Nations. It establishes domicile and freedom. This is why God has always had His kingdom of Heaven on earth. Often through individual Patriarchs from Adam to Noah and Shem to Abraham and Moses to David and finally Jesus the king.
With expatriation and repatriation one need not claim fraud or mistake but there may be a reason to do one or the other. The prodigal son, Luke 15:13.
I do not deny that there has been fraud in the creation of this world system, but I do believe that fraud should not be our first claim to voiding the relationship. The reason that I prefer the claim of "mistake" in reference to these constructive contracts is because 'mistake' focuses our attention on the beam in our own eye rather than the speck or beam in their eye. If we do not deal with our own foolishness we will simply be deceived again. Also it puts the burden of proof on them. A minor point but it sets the stage for where we should be going.
Since intent is the key element of a lawful contract, e.g. a meeting of the minds, the claim of "mistake" on our parts will work just as well as the claim of fraud. As distasteful as it may sound, in both cases, whatever tax that appears on the books should be paid-up for a number of reasons.
Many will tell you that you can leave such imagined obligations behind and "they can't touch you". This was not the advise Jesus gave Peter. Neither Jesus nor Peter owed the tax, nor did the remaining disciples. But because Peter made the mistake of saying that his master paid the tax, Jesus advised him to pay it. If Jesus is not reason enough, then I will point out that if you claim other than US citizenship by virtue of Rule 877 of the IRS codes (for what appears to be tax evasion), they have already claimed the right to confiscate all your property. This is done regularly and will continue to be done.
According to their own laws, you may expatriate to another recognized country at any time as long as you do not do so to evade taxes or apparent obligation of a preexisting nature. See:
"The 666 section" ..."HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1996," also known as Public Law 104-191 - 104th Congress, An Act." ... section 511 through 513 that provides for the forfeiture of property of anyone who losses his/her United States Citizenship (within the meaning of section 877 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). ...
Should you use the UCC forms to escape the power of this system?
The use of the "UCC Redemption" form (UCC-1 Finance Statement) is a claim that there was no 'mistake', that you agree with the constructive contracts, and you are taking the responsibility for any debt. You may claim fraud, but that is just saying that you believe those managing things have committed fraud. You are now taking over their responsibility that was once held collectively. The UCC is not within the U.S. alone, but worldwide.
It is that SSN number [and the certified membership it expands and represents] that brings you into debt subjugation and or vulnerability.
"Redemption is deliverance from the power of an alien dominion and the enjoyment of the resulting freedom. It involves the idea of restoration to one who possesses a more fundamental right or interest. The best example of redemption in the Old Testament was the deliverance of the children of Israel from bondage, from the dominion of the alien power in Egypt." according to Zondervan's Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible
There is only one nation whose king has not joined with the New World Order of Rome and yet is recognized by that order: The Kingdom of God on earth. They have proclaimed His Kingdom in an official document nailed on the cross and sealed in blood and renewed in modern Law. If they back out now, then their own blood is forfeited. They have a blood debt to the kingdom of God on earth.
The best example of redemption is Jesus Christ. You are redeemed in His Kingdom when you expatriate from the one you are in and repatriate to His.
Moses, by adoption, became the heir to the house of Pharaoh and therefore had title to the household of Pharaoh. When he said let my people go, he was talking about his property. Moses did not want to rule over the people, but set them free within the limits they could endure. This was not unlike like Abraham when he "exited" Haran and built his alter of earth, adamic clay.
Abraham had gone from, exited, the Indus Valley to Ur, Ur to Haran and finally expatriated when his father simply started another UCC authoritarian system in Haran. Moses Expatriated. He left his father's family.
Israel was a Theocratic Republic with individual patriarchal families at its core until the people went under a King. The Israelites expatriated again under Rehoboam. The Kingdom of Judah became the remnant of the Kingdom of God on earth under the Parens Patria of the House of David.
Jesus was the Highest son of David and therefore king of Judea. He was proclaimed by the people and by Rome which the Kingdom of Judea had invited into the country for the sole purpose of making such decisions. Jesus was a King according to the World Order then and now. He would not appeal to Rome, treaty with it or submit to its authority and neither would his followers which included at first of tens of thousands of those citizens of Judea who followed the way of Jesus. They then spread out through out all the nations.
Jesus appointed ministers to His Kingdom. "And I appoint unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto me;" [Luke 22:29]. They were not like the rulers and princes of the gentiles (nations). They could not exercise authority one over the other but were true servants, clerks of the Kingdom. These ministers and clerks spread a faith that created a dark age for tyrants.
There had been a split in the kingdom. Those that followed Jesus were the true Kingdom of God on earth, the Kingdom of Heaven which was "at hand". Those that denounced their inheritance by saying they had no king but Caesar were out, barring themselves from the promise.
In the following years this Kingdom of Heaven on earth was spread through out the world. Men were free to choose another king or not. For years Kings and centralized governments were constantly set back on their road to conquest. Why? Because Christianity was offering a new government of Liberty that operated on charity, love and faith through individual responsibility.
It was not like the government of the gentiles that exercised authority one over the other so in history it does not stand out like the dictators, depots and tyrants so well recorded in our public school texts as heroes of civilization. About mid millennium one of these would be Caesar had ventured out of his castle long enough to raise the ardor and contempt of the people. Men marched on his princely lair to teach him that tyranny would not be tolerated. His emissary went to meet this militia of freemen in hopes of negotiating a peace. After several weeks he came back frustrated saying he could make no treaty with their King for they say they are all kings.
Today, in the world, the United Nations, and the New World Order recognize the Kingdom of Jesus, but they are focusing on the false clerks and ministers who claim to be that Church. This is what happened at the time of Jesus with those who had usurped the priesthood by lies, distortions and the bloodshed of Zacharias and the prophets.
"The law of Truth was in His mouth, and iniquity was not found in his lips: he walked with me in peace and equity, and did turn many away from iniquity. For the priest's lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he [is] the messenger of the LORD of hosts. But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law; ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts. Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law. Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?" (Malachi 2:6, 10)
If you come out of the U.S. but continue in the ways of Canaan, then you have gained little to nothing. If you use "UCC Redemption" so you can continue to use the numbers of that system, then you are still bound. Social Security is a Corban system which Jesus preached against. There is no such system in the Kingdom of Heaven.
"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." Revelation 18:23
If a father and mother wish to be cared for in their old age they better start taken care of their children and raising them to be men and women of independence, love, patience and charity. Social Security System is also a Corvee system of statutory labor that Moses had led men out of. Our children are not held in service to them by anything more than our service, and love to them. If you have not rid yourself of the numbers of the system or its nature then you are not free of these systems. If you claim UCC redemption, then the debt is on you. To redeem is to take ownership by paying a special price. If UCC redeems you, then you must pay the price.
If you are redeemed in the Kingdom of Jesus on earth, which is still at hand, then His Blood, His Kingdom and His Coverture stands between the armies of Pharaoh and you. The seas will part before you.
We should find out what the Kingdom of Heaven on earth really is all about and what it really looks like and repatriate there for He, Yeshua, has provided our redemption in His Kingdom on earth where in which a real salvation is waiting for our times.
The ekklesia church does not sell the truth nor freedom with multilevel marketing plans. We do not charge for admission to the sermon on the mount. We are not Patriots of our Father in Heaven for profit. What we have received, we freely give.
The Church, like the Levites and porters, was instituted for a reason. "For so an entrance shall be ministered unto you abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ" (see 2 Peter 1:11).
This is what we hope to do as brothers at The ekklesia Church with the same Father in Heaven coming together in His name, e.g. with the Character of Christ.
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are sons of God. For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. (Romans 8:14,15)
You are Welcome to join in the Kingdom.
Peace be on your house
Gregory at the ekklesia@presys.com
Phone: (541) 943-3208 Fax: (541) 943-3268
Via Summer Lake Post Office,
Summer Lake, Oregon [97640]
Go here to read the rest of the thread.
http://ecclesia.org/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=56 _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 7:39 am Post subject: Feedback and Some Questioins... |
|
|
Feedback and some questions.
If anyone knows the exact answers to her questions, please let us know here.
Some of the authors of the above articles have either passed away, websites down, or want people to join forums just to ask questions. Otherwords, nearly impossible to contact many of them.
If anyone can assist, we would greatly appreciate it.
Quote: | From:
Subject: Inquiry - Marriage
To: womenwarriors@...
Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 11:43 AM
Hello,
My name is and I emailed MessiahMews a couple days ago and I have not yet received a reply.
My questions are relating to Marriage - I have Natural Marriage with my husband but I've been doing research and learning law in trying to figure out how
to get my name legally changed for the DMV, banks, and so on with the natural marriage without state license and marriage certificate. I have recorded our marriage in the
Bible and my family and friends knows us as married.
Thank you very much for any input on this question.
Have a wonderful day and I look forward to hearing from you shortly.
|
Quote: | Hello ,
Yes, I emailed you originally at the TWW email address. Thank you for responding so quickly. I have been looking over your links that you sent me and I found a couple others.
I have a couple questions.
1.) I have been searching for where there's a legal precedent for that the Family Bible recording of marriage is legal and binding so that I can have that to back that up if necessary if questioned when going to any of the agencies.
2.) With the Family Bible entry of my Natural Marriage to my Husband, I do not have to necessarily go to the state to file a notice or anything of that sort and from what I'm gleaning is that I can make a photocopy of my Bible entry and take that to the Social Security office, DMV, banks, etc and it shouldn't be an issue?
3.) Using the photocopy plus making a marriage certificate myself, plus Covenant marriage with "witness" signatures (with possibly including clergy that agrees to sign if I can find one) then that is pretty much even more stronger and still can go directly to agencies without having to go via state because the whole point of this is that I am married to my husband period. No one else.
Thank you so much for your links and pointing in me the direction I was needing to go. If you are interested in getting the new links I found, let me know.
Thanks so much!
Have a wonderful evening!
Take care
|
_________________
Last edited by MessiahMews on Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:28 pm Post subject: The Birth Certificate Scam |
|
|
http://www.ctbusters.com/home/2012/11/the-birth-certificate-scam/
Posted by Tango Charlie on Oct 25th, 2012 in Blogs, Featured, News Items
http://www.munication.com/the-birth-certificate-scam/
It really starts here with the rule of flags. The rule of flags works like this. In the old days of sailing ships if I was English and I was going to port in France my English displayed flag would indicate what terms and conditions [rules] I would trade under, likewise so do the flags of other nations I would trade with.
If I made port in France [knowing their terms and conditions of trade indicated by their flag] I would wait for the authorities to come and inspect my cargo as it was unloaded. I would then be charged tax [impost and excise taxes are the only true lawful taxes] then my goods could then be sent to a warehouse and I would be given a certificate to indicate my goods had been birthed on the land. I could then go and sell the goods certificate without having to cart my goods around with me.
The purchaser would simply go to the warehouse indicated by the numbers on the certificate and claim the numbered goods as they were the legal holder of the birth certificate.
Your birth certificate is in the same format.
You didn’t need a birth certificate but everyone is told you do, so your parents accidentally without full legal knowledge applied for one for you, at this stage you have been declared as goods birthed on the land.
Your government then waits a certain amount of days and claims you under salvage rights as their property under their care until the rightful owner of the goods come forth to claim them for themselves. This is the mechanism under which you are held to commercial laws.
The other thing you government [a registered corporation] does is register your name in capital letters as a company for you to use for in commerce. They then can use your name to rack up international loans, in exchange for money they guaranty the holder of the NAME will pay back the money. Starting to get it. This is the same NAME on all your licenses, and legal forms. This also locks you into the system of Commercial Law until you claim otherwise
At you birth you are a sovereign entity, a natural person or a living soul. You can use which ever of these terms you feel most comfortable with. From a legal standing you have free will this is apparent by your actions [think about Lincolns speech on freedom this is what he was talking about] A sovereign entity has the legal right to contract or not contract with anyone they wish. [yes you can sell/sign your rights to free will away] and by applying for a birth certificate you have entered in to a legal contract.
You are regarded as goods of the contract holder and must obey all the laws they pass. You are a chattel of you government [corporation].
What do they give you in exchange?
The entitlements vary from country to country but essentially you pay whatever tax they see fit and they agree to look after you in a certain manner and as contract holder [owners] they can change the terms and conditions when ever they see fit.
As you can see because you yourself didn’t enter into the contract yourself it is not legally binding but you have to declare this and have it recorded.
As a sovereign entity what rights do you have?
You are essentially the king or queen of your own country and you decide what rules you wish to follow for yourself as long as you don’t infringe upon anyone else’s rights you can do what you like.
What is the bad news?
If you reclaim your birth certificate and NAME your government will never give you another thing as long as you live, no retirement, no unemployment benefit, nothing. Unless you contract them to you using the Law of contracts.
What is the good news?
You no longer have to obey commercial law [of which there are between 1.6 and 2 million of depending on which country you reside in] you only have to obey common law [think magna carta even the king shall be held to common law] you don’t have to pay tax [except impost and excise tax] and you can write your own money.
The current money system isn’t money it is monetized credit or debt. We haven’t been using real money for quite some time. What we are using is promissory notes, that is to say we have bits of paper that have a figure on them with someones signature on them promising to pay the amount if real money ever becomes available again.
There is a guy in the U.S.A. who since 1996 has been showing people how to get out of their mortgages by taking the banks to court. Say you took out a $100,000 loan from the bank. What happened was you signed into life $100,000 then the banks kept this money and gave it to their buddies in finance who then loaned 90% of it out then they were able to keep lending out the promise to pay back this money a bonds and the like. Likewise the money the bank gives you also is lent out in such a manner.
This is where finance gets its money from, of the money in circulation about 15 billion dollars actually was created by you through the processes of your country borrowing money using your NAME and then the finance banks lending out the promise to pay this money back over and over.
How the court case works.
There are certain things that make a contract legal. One of them is consideration. This means a contract cannot be one sided, if one party is giving nothing [no consideration] to the other party in exchange for real goods or services then the contract is null and void. In court The Bank is simply asked to provide their paperwork to show where they lost money [ they didn’t of course because you signed the money into life with your signature] no bank has ever done this they simple release the contract and have to give back the money already paid off the mortgage. The court never has to rule against the bank as the case is dropped when the bank quickly sorts out the party and doesn’t get its name in the paper for losing a court case.
This is the real reason behind the international drive to find a new currency. Why can’t they sign money into life themselves?
Because they have agreed to follow commercial law [rules of the money game] and in agreeing to do so they aren’t allowed to cheat in the great game of commerce [they can cheat but there are consequences if they get caught, this is what all the rules of commerce is about it is just a game for big players]
Many people around the world are claiming back their freedom this is the silent paper revolution. The powers that be make this hard for people because if you don’t have their bits of paper you don’t fit into their frameworks [an effective way to control people, licenses, insurance, etc are frame works that control people and their rules can be changed at any time and you have to comply if you want the benefits] however people none the less are in greater numbers banding together and doing it anyway.
If you want more information on this I recommend an article by Mary Croft that is available for download at “The Crow House” it also details effective ways to deal with the courts.
In NZ you file a financing statement on the Personal Properties and Securities Register. In other countries it is under the UUC[ universal uniform code]
Don’t forget you also have the unlimited right not to contract if you don’t want to.
Don’t get it?
A cop gives you a speeding ticket, if you have a driving license of the country your in you have agreed to obey the rules, if you have claimed your NAME and birth certificate you can legally write up your own license as long as you sign it is legal, some countries might want you to have a photo or your self on it, no problem with a laminator and printer.
At this stage the ticket becomes an offer of contract which you may chose to accept or not. If you don’t disagree with it in the time period stated on the ticket you have agreed to it [law of contracts] in NZ this time period is 14 days in other countries it may be 28 days.
Capital relies on people paying interest on loans hence the attacks on countries where interest is illegal, in fact some of these countries say it is the work of the devil himself. If these countries banking system was to spread across the world the NWO would lose its second most valuable control point.
Can anyone say lets attack the Middle East, Africa and Egypt.
There will not be too many excuses for these people when the public understands they have been duped.
Everyone wakes up eventually. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
Posted: Sat Aug 03, 2013 10:05 am Post subject: Pamphlets by Pastor Matt Trewhella |
|
|
When your child is born at a hospital, the hospital personnel will come to you and ask that you fill out the birth certificate form and check the box to receive a Social Security number for your child. Refuse to do so. Just record your child’s birth in your Family Bible. If they try to tell you that you cannot leave the hospital unless you fill out the birth certificate form and check the box to receive a Social Security number, just ask them "what are the terms of this kidnapping?" They will back off real fast. Remember, receiving a Social Security number is voluntary. So is receiving a birth certificate. You are not required to sign for or fill out either. You need to know that many hospitals now automatically apply for your child to get a Social Security number when you fill out the birth certificate form. You need neither (regardless of what they tell you) and you’re wise not to fill out or sign for either.
Pamphlets by Pastor Matt Trewhella:
5 Reasons Why A Christian Should Not Obtain A State Marriage License
http://www.mercyseat.net/marriagelicense.html
Social Security - Idolatry and Slavery
http://www.mercyseat.net/ssnarticle.html
The Bible And Property Tax
http://www.mercyseat.net/bible_propertytax.html _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MessiahMews Woman Warrior
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Posts: 525 Location: Vaccination Liberation
|
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:36 am Post subject: TRACKING THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCHEME |
|
|
{{{{{{{5part series at bottom}}}}}}}
--IT'S TIME TO PUT THIS ISSUE TO BED-- "LEGALESE" at it's finest<<
...
TRACKING THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCHEME
HOW THE UNENLIGHTENED ARE PICKED CLEAN
When a child is born within the corporate United States, a Record of Live Birth form (a commercial Bill of Lading), or similar, is issued by the hospital. The father and mother sign this hospital form (a receipt for goods) as the parents (manufacturer) and title holders (owners) of the goods (child). The transfer of the property Rights (the child's Rights) to the State is accepted by the signature of their government agent, a State licensed Physician. The parents have unknowingly pledged their child's future and labors to the government and signed a presumed contract. This converts the legal status of their child to that of chattel property in permanently indentured servitude (See Preface, Part I). The State becomes the de facto holder of the Rights to the child (collateral).
Next, the hospital sends the Record of Live Birth to the State Bureau of Vital Statistics, sometimes called the department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) in some States. Each State is required to supply the Federal government with birth, death, and health statistics. The State agency that receives the Record of Live Birth (title) keeps it and then issues a Birth Certificate (BC). The BC is a commercial instrument (document) evidencing that the State is holding the title (ownership) to the child. Holding the title is not the same as having possession of the property, so the State is the "holder" of the instrument but not the "holder in due course". This is all based on the presumed acceptance of the contract (Record of Live Birth) between the manufacturer (parents) and the purchaser (State). The parents are not aware of this assumed contract because it was never revealed to them nor was full disclosure made in good faith, so they don't object to what they don't know. The current holder of your commercial birth document (receipt) is able to capitalize on it because of your failure to instruct the holder to do otherwise, due to your silence and lack of legal action.
cer·tif·i·cate, noun. Middle English certificat, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin certificatum, from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3 : a document evidencing ownership or debt. (Merriam Webster Dictionary 1998).
This Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce through their agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, who is responsible to collect vital statistics from all the States. The word "registered", in commercial law, does not mean that your name was merely noted in a registry or book for reference purposes. When a Birth Certificate is registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, it means that the child's persona named on it has become a surety or guarantor as collateral for a commercial loan.
registered. Security, bond. (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996).
Security. 1a: Something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation. Example: used his property as security for a loan. 1b: "surety". 2: Evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to ownership.
Bond. 1a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract) ...with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person ...to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety. 1b: One who acts as a surety. 2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need.
Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the original contract. (Duhaime's Law Dictionary).
1: a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking. 2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor, and the two terms are generally interchangeable. (Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996).
Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately, as part of an independently contract with the obligee of the original contract. (Duhaime's Law Dictionary).
It's not difficult to see that a Birth Certificate is a document evidencing debt the moment it's issued. This is how it works: Once each State has registered, by commercial bulk transfer, the Birth Certificates with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of the Treasury then issues Treasury Securities in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the BC's as sureties or guarantors for these purported Securities. This means that the bankrupt corporate U.S. can guarantee to the purchasers of their Securities the lifetime labor of all Americans as collateral for payment. Isn't it nice to know that when you were born, within days you became the collateral for corporate U.S. debt-loans through the assumed contract your parents thought was nothing more than a Record of Live Birth? But wait... the chain of events gets even more interesting.
Who purchases these Treasury Securities? Nearly all are purchased by commercial institutions and brokerage firms on behalf of their individual clients. These purchases are called commercial book entry transactions whereby the individual purchaser never receives a paper stock certificate. Follow very closely and see if you can notice the monopoly and identity of the World Power Brokers unfolding here. Key words are underlined:
1. The commercial book entry system is operated exclusively by the privately owned Federal Reserve System (formerly the Federal Reserve Bank) as fiscal agents of the U.S. Treasury Department.
2. All these securities are recorded in the commercial book entry system as "book entry issues" held for the account of the depository institution.
3. The exclusive depository institution is the Depository Trust Company (DTC), a privately owned trust company (bank), who maintains records identifying the individual "beneficial owners" of securities that the DTC holds (holder) in its account in the commercial book entry system.
4. The Depository Trust Company is an operating unit of (owned by) the Federal Reserve System.
5. The Depository Trust Company transfers all the securities to their own private holding company Cede & Company.
6. Cede & Company is the holder of nearly $20 trillion ($ 20,000,000,000,000) of stocks and bonds.
7. The Federal Reserve System uses the Treasury Securities it holds as collateral to print and issue Federal Reserve Notes, which are further debt obligations.
What starts out as a Record of Birth becomes a monopoly of collateral slavery in the hands of the World Power Brokers, also known as the privately owned Federal Reserve System. See who the owners are Learn more about the Depository Trust Company The ultimate Real Party of Interest to your persona, or strawman, is Cede & Company. Since you are the collateral and surety for the Treasury Securities that are physically held by them in their name. It's worthy to note that as you walk up to the DTC skyscraper at 55 Water Street in New York City, the sign in the front says "The Tower of Power".
When you reclaim the Title, Deed and ownership of the real you through your Birth Certificate by accepting it back for it's commercial value, you will regain your sovereignty, Freedom and Liberty. The "Wizards of Oz" (also known as the World Power Brokers) who have alleged to be the Real Party of Interest (RPOI), and all their agents, will then be legally powerless. Legally, only you can give yourself back your own inherent sovereignty.
Once again, the foundational truth being that "all law is contract", the World Power Brokers (WPB) have successfully made their claims by making us subject, via contract, to their sovereignty and ownership. The same rules that have made us servants and slaves to the WPB can also set us free from their legal claims. The key is going to the source and making it apply to our current legal status dilemna. There are many maxims (truths or proverbs) of Law that state this:
Nihil tam naturale est, qu m eo genere quidque dissolvere, quo colligatum est-- It is very natural that an obligation should not be dissolved but by the same principles which were observed in contracting it.
Qui evertit causam, evertit causatum futurum-- He who overthrows the cause, overthrows its future effects. Sublata causa tollitur effectus-- Remove the cause and the effect will cease.
Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est-- The principal part of everything is in the beginning.
The WPB followed these same Legal Rules to set up their "system". We must follow the same legal Rules to escape their "system". Knowing how they set this up is an element behind the reasoning for its existence.
Part V-II: Commercial Contracts and the UCC (continued)
When the original thirteen sovereign nations of North America declared and received independence more than 200 years ago, the World Power Brokers - comprised of kings, bankers, and merchants - lost a wealth of future commerce and profits from their previous Colony Franchises and Letters Patent. Since then, the WPB's have continually strived and schemed to regain their control and ownership of the real American People. They have been the instrumental force behind the conversion of free American states into the corporate and commercial United States. They have founded their "takeover" on outright deceit and presumptions without a single outcry from the American People. However, those presumptions and implied contracts can be rebutted according to the legalities they themselves have set into place. It's kind of like the old saying, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander". In order to get in the front door, they had to leave the back door open for their own protection in case they needed to escape. But who's to say their servants can't use the same back door to escape? The law says we can and the door has been left wide open. They simply cannot abolish the legal means of our escape unless they abolish the legal means that put them in power and control.
Their entire plan backfires in their faces when the contract presumptions are rebutted by the same legal Rules and Procedures they have set into place. The only reason they have succeeded to this point is that the American People now live in a false complacency; happy and satisfied with their debt contracts for houses, cars, boats, airplanes, and much more. But, many of us know that this lifestyle is soon to change into a more realistic picture of actual and physical servitude and slavery. The debts must be paid. Not only is the U.S. Government broke, but so are the American People. Had Christian Americans followed the principles and Laws written in the Bible, as did the early Americans, they would never be in this position. There is no doubt that the World Power Brokers have been dangling the bait of debt/credit as a means to entice the common man to obtain material wealth without having to pay up front for it. Has any average American ever taken the time to think what would happen if the loans they now have were all "called in" for payment? Where will you house your family? How will you drive to your job? How will you purchase your food?
"Can't happen", commented an ABA Lawyer reviewing this material. When we pointed out that any declared "emergency" by the bankrupt Federal Government voids the payment terms of all contracts and legally all debt becomes "due and payable at will", he thought about it again and had to agree with us. Our premise for argument was that Roosevelt confiscated all the gold in 1933 just for that purpose, as well as the Uniform Commercial Code itself, which states:
UCC 1-208 Option to accelerate at will.--A term providing that one party or the party's successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require collateral or additional collateral "at will" or "when she or he deems herself or himself insecure" or in words of similar import shall be construed to mean that she or he shall have power to do so only if she or he in good faith believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired. The burden of establishing lack of good faith is on the party against whom the power has been exercised.
Method of Rebuttal
In 1988, the federal and corporate United States joined the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods which now governs contracts within its scope. According to international and universal (uniform) Contract Law, such as the UCC, a contract can only be valid if it follows all the Rules and Process of law that created it. One of the main elements or rules of contract law states that "all parties must understand the scope, nature, terms, and conditions of the contract". Another main element states that "all parties must consent to the contract". If it is not agreed to and there is no mutual consent, then there is no contract. Any purported commercial contract that fails to be entered into by mutual "good faith", with full disclosure of the terms and conditions to both parties, and consent by all parties, is void ab initio (from the beginning). Whenever the elements of "good faith" disclosure and/or "consent" are missing, any contract can automatically be ruled null and void if the deceived or defrauded party enforces the Rules of Law. Once again, silence is default. If you say nothing, you have defaulted.
UCC 1-203 Obligation of good faith.--Every contract or duty within this code imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.
Were you aware of the implied and "presumed" contract between you and the Real Party of Interest, the owners of the Federal Reserve System? In all law and truth, it doesn't exist, does it?
UCC 1-201 Definitions-- (31) "Presumption" or "presumed" means that the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact presumed unless and until evidence is introduced which would support a finding of its nonexistence.
Were all terms and conditions disclosed to you at birth or any time since then? Of course not. Legally, once you rebut the presumption by affidavit for failure to disclose the terms and conditions or obtain mutual consent, the contract automatically becomes null and void. Such a contract as this, which has unlawfully bound the average American to it, is considered fraud or misrepresentation. For example:
UCC 1-103 Supplementary general principles of law applicable.--Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this code, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions.
As you can now see, the major flaw in all artificial governments and their "laws" is the absence of a genuine and legal agreement between the parties due to a failure to fully disclose, have a meeting of the minds, and lack mutual "good faith". In their presumption that you have agreed to a bona fide contract with the government, you were never informed of the full terms and conditions of the purported contract.
The reason this situation could exist in the first place is due to the fact that the American People have fooled themselves, lied to themselves, and failed to communicate among themselves. They have put aside their Holy Bibles and replaced the True Law of God with the laws of men. The world of man's laws and governments was brought about by the very people who are now servants to the "system". Since Lincoln's War, Christian Americans have lived in fear of speaking out against wrongs that they see taking place.
According to the universal principles and foundations of contract law (See Background, Part I), in the absence of a genuine agreement, no contract exists. What does exist is nothing more than a presumption of contract based on the deceived party (you) having foolishly trusted in the government. Although fraud is unlawful, it is not illegal in artificial State rulership systems. Keep in mind, once again, that all governments are structurally fraudulent due to the origins of their artificial conception. Based on this premise of evidence, it's an obvious fact that fraud must be "legal" as governments are able to judge themselves as legal in the first place. In other words, the existence of a government is a legality of fraud ab initio.
Holder in Due Course
In Commercial Law, the ultimate owner of any "Document of Title" is known as the "Holder in Due Course" (HDC). He is the only one who possesses a valid claim to "title" whereby the goods or property are deliverable to him. By comparison, a technical "Holder" may legally possess a "Negotiable Instrument", but he lacks the ultimate claim of "title" held by the HDC and is nothing more than a receiver and collector of payments. The HDC receives the delivery of the property; the Holder merely receives payment for the property.
UCC 1-201 DEFINITIONS-- (20) "Holder," with respect to a negotiable instrument, means the person in possession if the instrument is payable to bearer or, in the case of an instrument payable to an identified person, if the identified person is in possession. "Holder," with respect to a document of title, means the person in possession if the goods are deliverable to bearer or to the order of the person in possession.
UCC 3-302 HOLDER IN DUE COURSE-- Subject to subsection (c) and Section 3-106(d), "holder in due course" means the holder of an instrument if: (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or is not otherwise so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity; and (2) the holder took the instrument (i) for value, (ii) in good faith, (iii) without notice that the instrument is overdue or has been dishonored or that there is an uncured default with respect to payment of another instrument issued as part of the same series, (iv) without notice that the instrument contains an unauthorized signature or has been altered, (v) without notice of any claim to the instrument described in Section 3-306, and (vi) without notice that any party has a defense or claim in recoupment described in Section 3-305(a).
As stated earlier, your Birth Certificate is simply a warehouse receipt. Birth Certificates are bundled together and transferred or purchased in "bulk sales" under one or more of the provisions found in UCC 6-104 through 108. However, possession of your Birth Certificate was not taken by the government in "good faith" and the legal Holder (government) cannot "enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses." This means that whoever, or whatever artificial entity, is now acting as the purported "owner" of your Birth Certificate can, in legal reality, only be only a technical "Holder" of the Negotiable Instrument and can never be the actual "Holder in due Course". Only you can be the HDC.
The HDC is the most powerful position in any exchange of property or goods in commercial law. The allodial key to understanding this lies in whether you are or are not the HDC of your Document of Title of birth, the Negotiable Instrument to your legal existence. Once you see that you are the legal HDC to your own Title of Rights, your whole worldly life will change dramatically. You are then, once again, a sovereign with respect to anything of which you are the Holder in Due Course. This will make you the HDC of "yourself", both the real biological person and the artificial persona. It will place you as the ultimate owner of all your earthly affairs and everything else concerning ownership of your legal life. When you really think about it, this is the "legal" means by which your physical being and your Spiritual being can join together in true Freedom and Liberty.
The "secret" to becoming the HDC is known as "Acceptance for Value." Your Birth Certificate (Document of Title) is currently held by "unknown parties" who can never be the HDC of it. Only you, and you alone, can become the HDC. When your offer of "purchase" is made, title passes upon acceptance of the offer. The offer (your UCC-1) is accepted by the previous Holder (the government) when they record it in the State records for a fee payment (value). The "acceptance for value" is made by the government in accordance with two Rules of law: One, the fee paid for recording the instrument; Two, since it is recorded without objection, it is also accepted by their own conduct, both implied and direct.
All that remains to do at this point is to give or show affidavit evidence of the exchange (a copy of your recorded UCC-1 Financing Statement with the State acceptance seal and certification). "Acceptance" and "offer" are the two mandatory elements to any legal contract in commercial law. "Acceptance" or "Acceptance for Value", for the purpose of commercial law, is "acquiescence". Look carefully at these definitions written by Canadian lawyer Lloyd Duhaime from Duhaime's Law Dictionary:
Acceptance. A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties which starts with an offer from one person but which does not become a contract until the other party signifies an unequivocal willingness to accept the terms of that offer. The moment of acceptance is the moment from which a contract is said to exist, and not before. Acceptance need not always be direct and can be implied by conduct.
Acquiescence. Action or inaction which binds a person legally even though it was not intended as such. For example, action which is not intended as a direct acceptance of a contract will nevertheless stand as such as it implies recognition of the terms of the contract. If I display a basket of fruit in a marketplace and you come by, inspect an apple and then bite into it, you have acquiesced to the contract of sale of that apple.
Offer. An explicit proposal to contract which, if accepted, completes the contract and binds both the person that made the offer and the person accepting the offer to the terms of the contract.
In this modern world, man's laws dictate that there are only two classes of people in any legal proceeding. You are either a Creditor or a Debtor. When your "legal sovereignty" is established, you become the sovereign Creditor of your life and affairs. Every adverse party then becomes your Debtor. However, if you do not establish your legal sovereignty, you do not "own" yourself (your own title) as the HDC; you have no legal capacity; you have no "standing in law" to assert your Rights; and you will remain a permanent Debtor as you are now. As Debtor, you will always lose in every dispute or claim by the current "system" for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted".
Reclaiming the legal ownership of your persona (straw man) acts as an "equitable estoppel" to any and all who come against you in commerce and law.
equitable estoppel. An estoppel that prevents a person from adopting a new position that contradicts a previous position maintained by words, silence, or actions when allowing the new position to be adopted would unfairly harm another person who has relied on the previous position to his or her loss. (called also estoppel in pais). Source- Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996.
If you do not reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona, which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your "straw man", you will not be sovereign and you will lose every claim made against you. This is the reason why, if you ever think of hiring an ABA attorney to represent you in any legal proceeding against the "system", you must demand up front that he make you the Holder in Due Course of the action. Since he legally can't do this, then you will lose if he "appears" for or "represents" you. The best any Bar(fly) attorney can do is make a deal with the system Creditor, which is a negotiated settlement of the money being claimed as damages. You must be the HDC to be able to ensure victory in all dealings with the government and the "system".
We conclude Part V with some Maxims for you to absorb:
Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere-- Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus-- False in one thing, false in everything.
Quae malasunt inchoata in principio vex peragantur exitu-- Things bad in the commencement seldom end well.
Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere-- What is not good in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time.
Nihil tam naturale est, qu m eo genere quidque dissolvere, quo colligatum est-- It is very natural that an obligation should not be dissolved but by the same principles which were observed in contracting it.
Qui evertit causam, evertit causatum futurum-- He who overthrows the cause, overthrows its future effects. Sublata causa tollitur effectus-- Remove the cause and the effect will cease.
Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est-- The principal part of everything is in the beginning.
The WPB followed these same Legal Rules to set up their "system". We must follow the same legal Rules to escape their "system". Knowing how they set this up is an element behind the reasoning for its existence.
Part V-II: Commercial Contracts and the UCC (continued)
When the original thirteen sovereign nations of North America declared and received independence more than 200 years ago, the World Power Brokers - comprised of kings, bankers, and merchants - lost a wealth of future commerce and profits from their previous Colony Franchises and Letters Patent. Since then, the WPB's have continually strived and schemed to regain their control and ownership of the real American People. They have been the instrumental force behind the conversion of free American states into the corporate and commercial United States. They have founded their "takeover" on outright deceit and presumptions without a single outcry from the American People. However, those presumptions and implied contracts can be rebutted according to the legalities they themselves have set into place. It's kind of like the old saying, "What's good for the goose is good for the gander". In order to get in the front door, they had to leave the back door open for their own protection in case they needed to escape. But who's to say their servants can't use the same back door to escape? The law says we can and the door has been left wide open. They simply cannot abolish the legal means of our escape unless they abolish the legal means that put them in power and control.
Their entire plan backfires in their faces when the contract presumptions are rebutted by the same legal Rules and Procedures they have set into place. The only reason they have succeeded to this point is that the American People now live in a false complacency; happy and satisfied with their debt contracts for houses, cars, boats, airplanes, and much more. But, many of us know that this lifestyle is soon to change into a more realistic picture of actual and physical servitude and slavery. The debts must be paid. Not only is the U.S. Government broke, but so are the American People. Had Christian Americans followed the principles and Laws written in the Bible, as did the early Americans, they would never be in this position. There is no doubt that the World Power Brokers have been dangling the bait of debt/credit as a means to entice the common man to obtain material wealth without having to pay up front for it. Has any average American ever taken the time to think what would happen if the loans they now have were all "called in" for payment? Where will you house your family? How will you drive to your job? How will you purchase your food?
"Can't happen", commented an ABA Lawyer reviewing this material. When we pointed out that any declared "emergency" by the bankrupt Federal Government voids the payment terms of all contracts and legally all debt becomes "due and payable at will", he thought about it again and had to agree with us. Our premise for argument was that Roosevelt confiscated all the gold in 1933 just for that purpose, as well as the Uniform Commercial Code itself, which states:
UCC 1-208 Option to accelerate at will.--A term providing that one party or the party's successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require collateral or additional collateral "at will" or "when she or he deems herself or himself insecure" or in words of similar import shall be construed to mean that she or he shall have power to do so only if she or he in good faith believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired. The burden of establishing lack of good faith is on the party against whom the power has been exercised.
Method of Rebuttal
In 1988, the federal and corporate United States joined the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods which now governs contracts within its scope. According to international and universal (uniform) Contract Law, such as the UCC, a contract can only be valid if it follows all the Rules and Process of law that created it. One of the main elements or rules of contract law states that "all parties must understand the scope, nature, terms, and conditions of the contract". Another main element states that "all parties must consent to the contract". If it is not agreed to and there is no mutual consent, then there is no contract. Any purported commercial contract that fails to be entered into by mutual "good faith", with full disclosure of the terms and conditions to both parties, and consent by all parties, is void ab initio (from the beginning). Whenever the elements of "good faith" disclosure and/or "consent" are missing, any contract can automatically be ruled null and void if the deceived or defrauded party enforces the Rules of Law. Once again, silence is default. If you say nothing, you have defaulted.
UCC 1-203 Obligation of good faith.--Every contract or duty within this code imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.
Were you aware of the implied and "presumed" contract between you and the Real Party of Interest, the owners of the Federal Reserve System? In all law and truth, it doesn't exist, does it?
UCC 1-201 Definitions-- (31) "Presumption" or "presumed" means that the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact presumed unless and until evidence is introduced which would support a finding of its nonexistence.
Were all terms and conditions disclosed to you at birth or any time since then? Of course not. Legally, once you rebut the presumption by affidavit for failure to disclose the terms and conditions or obtain mutual consent, the contract automatically becomes null and void. Such a contract as this, which has unlawfully bound the average American to it, is considered fraud or misrepresentation. For example:
UCC 1-103 Supplementary general principles of law applicable.--Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this code, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions.
As you can now see, the major flaw in all artificial governments and their "laws" is the absence of a genuine and legal agreement between the parties due to a failure to fully disclose, have a meeting of the minds, and lack mutual "good faith". In their presumption that you have agreed to a bona fide contract with the government, you were never informed of the full terms and conditions of the purported contract.
The reason this situation could exist in the first place is due to the fact that the American People have fooled themselves, lied to themselves, and failed to communicate among themselves. They have put aside their Holy Bibles and replaced the True Law of God with the laws of men. The world of man's laws and governments was brought about by the very people who are now servants to the "system". Since Lincoln's War, Christian Americans have lived in fear of speaking out against wrongs that they see taking place.
According to the universal principles and foundations of contract law (See Background, Part I), in the absence of a genuine agreement, no contract exists. What does exist is nothing more than a presumption of contract based on the deceived party (you) having foolishly trusted in the government. Although fraud is unlawful, it is not illegal in artificial State rulership systems. Keep in mind, once again, that all governments are structurally fraudulent due to the origins of their artificial conception. Based on this premise of evidence, it's an obvious fact that fraud must be "legal" as governments are able to judge themselves as legal in the first place. In other words, the existence of a government is a legality of fraud ab initio.
Holder in Due Course
In Commercial Law, the ultimate owner of any "Document of Title" is known as the "Holder in Due Course" (HDC). He is the only one who possesses a valid claim to "title" whereby the goods or property are deliverable to him. By comparison, a technical "Holder" may legally possess a "Negotiable Instrument", but he lacks the ultimate claim of "title" held by the HDC and is nothing more than a receiver and collector of payments. The HDC receives the delivery of the property; the Holder merely receives payment for the property.
UCC 1-201 DEFINITIONS-- (20) "Holder," with respect to a negotiable instrument, means the person in possession if the instrument is payable to bearer or, in the case of an instrument payable to an identified person, if the identified person is in possession. "Holder," with respect to a document of title, means the person in possession if the goods are deliverable to bearer or to the order of the person in possession.
UCC 3-302 HOLDER IN DUE COURSE-- Subject to subsection (c) and Section 3-106(d), "holder in due course" means the holder of an instrument if: (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or is not otherwise so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity; and (2) the holder took the instrument (i) for value, (ii) in good faith, (iii) without notice that the instrument is overdue or has been dishonored or that there is an uncured default with respect to payment of another instrument issued as part of the same series, (iv) without notice that the instrument contains an unauthorized signature or has been altered, (v) without notice of any claim to the instrument described in Section 3-306, and (vi) without notice that any party has a defense or claim in recoupment described in Section 3-305(a).
As stated earlier, your Birth Certificate is simply a warehouse receipt. Birth Certificates are bundled together and transferred or purchased in "bulk sales" under one or more of the provisions found in UCC 6-104 through 108. However, possession of your Birth Certificate was not taken by the government in "good faith" and the legal Holder (government) cannot "enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses." This means that whoever, or whatever artificial entity, is now acting as the purported "owner" of your Birth Certificate can, in legal reality, only be only a technical "Holder" of the Negotiable Instrument and can never be the actual "Holder in due Course". Only you can be the HDC.
The HDC is the most powerful position in any exchange of property or goods in commercial law. The allodial key to understanding this lies in whether you are or are not the HDC of your Document of Title of birth, the Negotiable Instrument to your legal existence. Once you see that you are the legal HDC to your own Title of Rights, your whole worldly life will change dramatically. You are then, once again, a sovereign with respect to anything of which you are the Holder in Due Course. This will make you the HDC of "yourself", both the real biological person and the artificial persona. It will place you as the ultimate owner of all your earthly affairs and everything else concerning ownership of your legal life. When you really think about it, this is the "legal" means by which your physical being and your Spiritual being can join together in true Freedom and Liberty.
The "secret" to becoming the HDC is known as "Acceptance for Value." Your Birth Certificate (Document of Title) is currently held by "unknown parties" who can never be the HDC of it. Only you, and you alone, can become the HDC. When your offer of "purchase" is made, title passes upon acceptance of the offer. The offer (your UCC-1) is accepted by the previous Holder (the government) when they record it in the State records for a fee payment (value). The "acceptance for value" is made by the government in accordance with two Rules of law: One, the fee paid for recording the instrument; Two, since it is recorded without objection, it is also accepted by their own conduct, both implied and direct.
All that remains to do at this point is to give or show affidavit evidence of the exchange (a copy of your recorded UCC-1 Financing Statement with the State acceptance seal and certification). "Acceptance" and "offer" are the two mandatory elements to any legal contract in commercial law. "Acceptance" or "Acceptance for Value", for the purpose of commercial law, is "acquiescence". Look carefully at these definitions written by Canadian lawyer Lloyd Duhaime from Duhaime's Law Dictionary:
Acceptance. A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties which starts with an offer from one person but which does not become a contract until the other party signifies an unequivocal willingness to accept the terms of that offer. The moment of acceptance is the moment from which a contract is said to exist, and not before. Acceptance need not always be direct and can be implied by conduct.
Acquiescence. Action or inaction which binds a person legally even though it was not intended as such. For example, action which is not intended as a direct acceptance of a contract will nevertheless stand as such as it implies recognition of the terms of the contract. If I display a basket of fruit in a marketplace and you come by, inspect an apple and then bite into it, you have acquiesced to the contract of sale of that apple.
Offer. An explicit proposal to contract which, if accepted, completes the contract and binds both the person that made the offer and the person accepting the offer to the terms of the contract.
In this modern world, man's laws dictate that there are only two classes of people in any legal proceeding. You are either a Creditor or a Debtor. When your "legal sovereignty" is established, you become the sovereign Creditor of your life and affairs. Every adverse party then becomes your Debtor. However, if you do not establish your legal sovereignty, you do not "own" yourself (your own title) as the HDC; you have no legal capacity; you have no "standing in law" to assert your Rights; and you will remain a permanent Debtor as you are now. As Debtor, you will always lose in every dispute or claim by the current "system" for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted".
Reclaiming the legal ownership of your persona (straw man) acts as an "equitable estoppel" to any and all who come against you in commerce and law.
equitable estoppel. An estoppel that prevents a person from adopting a new position that contradicts a previous position maintained by words, silence, or actions when allowing the new position to be adopted would unfairly harm another person who has relied on the previous position to his or her loss. (called also estoppel in pais). Source- Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Law 1996.
If you do not reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona, which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your "straw man", you will not be sovereign and you will lose every claim made against you. This is the reason why, if you ever think of hiring an ABA attorney to represent you in any legal proceeding against the "system", you must demand up front that he make you the Holder in Due Course of the action. Since he legally can't do this, then you will lose if he "appears" for or "represents" you. The best any Bar(fly) attorney can do is make a deal with the system Creditor, which is a negotiated settlement of the money being claimed as damages. You must be the HDC to be able to ensure victory in all dealings with the government and the "system".
We conclude Part V with some Maxims for you to absorb:
Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere-- Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus-- False in one thing, false in everything.
Quae malasunt inchoata in principio vex peragantur exitu-- Things bad in the commencement seldom end well.
Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere-- What is not good in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Santos Bonacci explains how Over the past Two thousand years the Roman Cult/Empire has set up a System of ownership of all property and souls that exists on this earth through their Papal Bulls And Trusts. Enslavement and ownership is their business, literally!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unam_sanctum
All Western Nations 'require' their national citizens 'By Law' to Register their children and aquire a birth certificate! That birth certificate and it numbers that indentify you to it are connected to the Trust (Cestui Que Vie trust) See how it is through this ingenious system that we have all been enslaved. Learn how to free yourself!!!
==========================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPThMecnCMA PART1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtP6wjRnX1o PART2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ls7835sBuc4 PART3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_1WR9_JmIU PART4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GExkyCp0zbw PART5
________________________________
Abolish the act of 1871
http://tatoott1009.com/2012/10/03/copy-this-below-and-share-it-with-everyone-you-know-district-of-columbia-act-of-1871/
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|